Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta King Charles III. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta King Charles III. Mostrar todas las entradas

Princess Diana. Queen offered to restore Diana's HRH... after she died: The book so raw and revealing it's sparked a bitter war of words between the King and Earl Spencer


The front cover of Charles Spencer's book "Swan Song, Diana: My Sister"

Queen offered to restore Diana's HRH... after she died: The book so raw and revealing it's sparked a bitter war of words between the King and Earl Spencer.

The late Queen dramatically offered to restore Princess Diana's royal title on the day of her funeral, a bombshell book claims.

Earl Spencer describes in his explosive memoir – being exclusively serialised by the Daily Mail – how Queen Elizabeth proposed handing back his sister's Her Royal Highness title, which she controversially lost when she divorced Prince Charles.

The earl was told of the extraordinary offer by Robert Fellowes, the Queen's Private Secretary and his brother-in-law, as they travelled by Royal Train to Diana's private burial at Althorp, the Spencer family's 13,000-acre estate in Northamptonshire.

The late Queen Elizabeth paid tribute to Diana on September 5, 1997 - after the Princess of Wales was killed in a car crash

The late Queen Elizabeth paid tribute to Diana on September 5, 1997 - after the Princess of Wales was killed in a car crash 

Charles and Diana are seen visiting Venice during their trip to Italy in May 1985.

Charles and Diana are seen visiting Venice during their trip to Italy in May 1985

Earl Spencer, Prince William, Prince Harry and then Prince Charles stand outside Westminster Abbey on the day of Princess Diana's funeral.

Earl Spencer, Prince William, Prince Harry and then Prince Charles stand outside Westminster Abbey on the day of Princess Diana's funeral

The response echoed Queen Elizabeth's famous 'recollections may vary' retort to Harry and Meghan after their interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021.

Royal commentators said the strength of the intervention showed the King was 'absolutely incandescent' with Earl Spencer. In today's extract, the earl claims:

  • Diana told her father she could not go through with the marriage to Prince Charles a month before the wedding – but he told her it was 'impossible to pull out';
  • The day before the wedding Charles told Diana that while he was happy to marry her, he was not in love with her;
  • Diana was so unhappy that she considered suicide and drove herself 'more than once' to Beachy Head cliffs in East Sussex;
  • Charles sounded 'giddily elated – like a lottery winner' shortly after Diana's death.

Announcing the book last month, Earl Spencer said that, ahead of the 30th anniversary of Diana's death next year, he wanted to write down his own thoughts and memories 'rather than having the discomfort of again reading the opinions of others'.

The Mail has learnt that Prince Harry was aware of his uncle's memoir but has not read it and was not briefed on its explosive contents, despite staying at Althorp this summer.

Diana lost her HRH title after her divorce in August 1996 and was instead styled Diana, Princess of Wales.

Describing the Queen's offer, made just hours after he delivered his defiant eulogy at Diana's funeral, Earl Spencer writes: 'When we had gone some miles, Robert beckoned me to follow him into a quiet corner of the carriage. 

'I have just received a call from Her Majesty …and she would like to offer Diana her HRH title back.' Mr Fellowes died in 2024.

The earl later wondered whether he was right to reject the offer, and that 'maybe Diana would have seen some point in having HRH carved on her tombstone'. 

The Earl, Diana and Charles at the Earl's 21st birthday party in 1985 at the Mirabelle restaurant in London

The Earl, Diana and Charles at the Earl's 21st birthday party in 1985 at the Mirabelle restaurant in London

The front cover of Charles Spencer's book "Swan Song, Diana: My Sister"

The front cover of Charles Spencer's book 'Swan Song, Diana: My Sister'

But he said he 'had no doubt that the consolation prize was hollow, however well-meaning the Queen's gesture', adding: 'The title should never have been removed during her life, in which case it would not have been necessary to offer it to her in death.'

The memoir provides, for the first time, Earl Spencer's insight into his sister's deeply unhappy 15-year marriage and the then Prince of Wales's love for her rival Camilla.

He recalls that on the day of Diana's magnificent wedding in July 1981, he visited her at Clarence House where he found her 'sitting quietly in front of a mirror'.

'Only much later would I discover that, as she confided to a close friend, her husband-to-be had told her the previous day that she needed to know that he was very happy to marry her, but he was not actually in love with her,' he writes.

Royal watchers were stunned by the Palace's highly unusual response to Earl Spencer's book.

In the statement, released on Wednesday night, it said: 'While we do not comment on books as a matter of principle, His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss.'

One royal aide later described the earl's account to the BBC as a 'demonstrably untrue claim' about a deeply compassionate man.

Julian Payne, the King's former communications secretary, yesterday said the King had told staff never to criticise Diana for years after her death.

Mr Payne, who worked for the then Prince Charles and Duchess of Cornwall for five years from 2016, including during the 20th anniversary of Diana's death in 2017, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'He was absolutely emphatic that we were to respect her memory and not undermine it in any way.'

The Palace declined to comment on the earl's further claims last night.

“King Charles III shuts the door on Harry and Meghan: ‘They are no longer working members of the Royal Family.’”

 Here's Why Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Skipped the 2026 Met Gala and  What They Did InsteadPrince Harry, Meghan Markle 'Surprised' by King Charles Letter

Harry and Meghan yesterday hit out at the King's decision to label them 'private citizens' – because they want to be known as 'public figures' instead.

Buckingham Palace on Monday released a letter of 'guidance' on the monarch's behalf, confirming the couple were not returning to the UK as working royals.

Yet – rather than accept the letter, which said nothing had changed since 'Megxit' – briefings yesterday by sources close to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex made a string of extraordinary claims.

Harry and Meghan hit out yesterday at the King's decision to label them 'private citizens'

Harry and Meghan hit out yesterday at the King's decision to label them 'private citizens' 

In a letter of 'guidance' released on King Charles' behalf, the Palace confirmed that the Sussexes have not returned to be working royals

Buckingham Palace declined to comment, feeling the letter is sufficient.

But insiders last night suggested this insistence they be classed as 'public figures' who want their royal links burnished in public is evidence why the Sussexes' preferred 'half-in, half-out' model would never be sustainable alongside their commercial activities.

A Sussex spokesman also suggested they had been caught 'off guard' by the King's announcement, which was a letter written by Lord Benyon to officials across the country.

Team Sussex claimed the letter's contents were shared with them at 1.59pm.

They replied at 2.19pm 'in the hope' the Sussexes could have 'the chance to clarify one or two points'.

Unbeknown to the Palace, Harry was visiting Tower Bridge Studios in London and 'could not be contacted' until 3.09pm.

At 3.11pm, they received confirmation it had already been sent to the media five minutes earlier.

Sources close to the couple have suggested the letter was timed to come ahead of a meeting yesterday of the Ravec security body.

They believe this may have been an attempt to influence the committee on whether to reinstate Harry's taxpayer-funded security.

But the Daily Mail understands such claims are incorrect and the letter was sent out to offer clarity ahead of a busy programme for the Sussexes. Those close to the King also think the move could make it easier for him to see his son privately.


BREAKING NEWS'King Charles is NOT dead': Ukraine's British embassy issues furious denial after Russian media shared fake Buckingham Palace statement claiming Monarch 'passed away unexpectedly yesterday afternoon'

 Photos: King Charles III coronation culminates seven-decade journey from  heir to monarch - Los Angeles Times

BREAKING NEWS'King Charles is NOT dead'

  • A host of Russian news sites today reported the King had died aged 75

Ukraine's British embassy was today forced to give an official statement confirming King Charles III is still alive after Russian media claimed he had died.

A host of Russian news sites and their associated social media accounts reported earlier today that the King had died aged 75 as a result of cancer complications, citing unnamed 'media' sources in an inexplicable stream of posts.

It came as an image of a clearly fake statement from 'Buckingham Palace' reporting Charles' 'unexpected death' was circulated on social media.

'King Charles III of Great Britain has died at the age of 75, according to media reports,' Russian newswire Sputnik reported.

'There is no information about this on the royal family website or in the British media.'

Minutes later their stories were updated after they were forced to climb down following reports the King was in fact not dead.

The British Embassy in Kyiv shared an abrupt notice on social media that read: 'We would like to inform you that the news about the death of King Charles III is fake.'  

A host of Russian news sites and their associated social media accounts reported earlier today that the King had died aged 75

Ukraine 's British embassy was today forced to give an official statement confirming King Charles III is still alive after Russian media claimed he had died

Ukraine 's British embassy was today forced to give an official statement confirming King Charles III is still alive after Russian media claimed he had died

A tweet by Gazeta.ru perpetuated the rumours that Charles had died

A tweet by Gazeta.ru perpetuated the rumours that Charles had died 

The fake palace announcement was dated today and said: 'The King passed away unexpectedly yesterday afternoon'

The fake palace announcement was dated today and said: 'The King passed away unexpectedly yesterday afternoon'

Several prominent outlets reported the bogus news but it was not immediately clear whether they had made an error or whether Vladimir Putin's propaganda machine was directly behind it.

The sick stunt involving the monarch followed criticism in Britain and other Western countries of Vladimir Putin's election 'victory' in a 'rigged' presidential election.

The British embassy's Telegram channel posted a notice in Russian to stress the reports were fake.

'Reports about the death of King Charles III of Great Britain are fake,' said the announcement, shortly after the British Embassy in Ukraine issued a similar message.

Early outlets running the fake report were RIA, Sputnik, Readkovka and Mash - staunchly pro-Putin outlets - but all later corrected their stories.

Mash media outlet wrote: 'Britain's King Charles III has died, Buckingham Palace reports. The son of Elizabeth II ascended the throne less than a year ago - the coronation took place on May 6, 2023. He was 75 years old.'

It updated to say 'the message turned out to be fake' while adding: 'Let us remember that a few months ago he was diagnosed with cancer.'

But the outlet later stated: 'The fake news about the death of Charles III quickly spread and was just as quickly debunked.

'The King of Great Britain is alive and continues to go about his business. At least that's what Buckingham Palace says.'

Even Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov's spokeswoman Maria Zakharova joined the fray, posting: 'London looks pathetic.'

Early outlets running the fake report were RIA, Sputnik, Readkovka and Mash - staunchly pro-Putin outlets - but all later corrected their stories

Early outlets running the fake report were RIA, Sputnik, Readkovka and Mash - staunchly pro-Putin outlets - but all later corrected their stories

The Kremlin-linked pro-war media outlet Readovka was one of the first Russian media sources to post a fake Buckingham Palace statement about the death of King Charles III

The Kremlin-linked pro-war media outlet Readovka was one of the first Russian media sources to post a fake Buckingham Palace statement about the death of King Charles III

Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov's spokeswoman Maria Zakharova joined the fray, posting: 'London looks pathetic'

Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov's spokeswoman Maria Zakharova joined the fray, posting: 'London looks pathetic'

Pro-Kremlin BAZA online media posted: 'The Russian media reported the death of British King Charles III with reference to a document allegedly published by Buckingham Palace.

'The screenshot of the message about the death of Charles III turned out to be fake.'

The fake palace announcement was dated today and said: 'The King passed away unexpectedly yesterday afternoon.'

Independent outlet Meduza stated: 'A number of media and Telegram channels reported the death of the British King Charles III - with reference to a fake statement from Buckingham Palace.

'A screenshot of the statement, which became a news source, is provided, in particular, by the BAZA Telegram channel.

'This statement is not on the website or social networks of the royal family.'

Russian state news outlet RIA Novosti corrected its earlier report while admitting it was based on 'rumours', stating: 'The press service of Buckingham Palace denied RIA Novosti rumours about the death of King Charles III. 

'He continues to conduct official and private affairs.

'Information about Charles' death appeared some time ago in many Russian sources. The basis for it was a certain message, the authorship of which was attributed to Buckingham Palace and which, apparently, turned out to be a fake.'

State news agency TASS reported that the story was fake.

The Kremlin's own newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta, published by Putin's government, wrote: 'King Charles III continues to carry out work and private affairs, Buckingham Palace said.

'Previously, many Telegram channels published unverified and false information about the death of the monarch.'