EXCLUSIVE Hillary Clinton Explodes Over Horndog Bill’s Latest Humiliation!

EXCLUSIVE

Hillary Clinton Explodes Over Horndog Bill’s Latest Humiliation!

Find out all the juicy details on the hot-headed presidential candidate.


bill-clinton-mistress-energizer-julie-tauber-mcmahon-humiliates-hillary-pp
Getty Images
Hillary Clinton flew into a furious rage  when she was blindsided by last month’s media coverage of horndog hubby Bill’s massive payoffs to support an alleged former mistress’ business, RadarOnline.com can exclusively reveal.
“Hill was foaming at the mouth, when she had to read about it instead of hearing it from Bill first!” one Clinton family insider claims.
The presidential candidate, who is embroiled in a tooth-and-nail campaign battle with Republican nominee Donald Trump, was caught short by the humiliating news that the Clinton Global Initiative forked over a staggering $2 million to a for-profit company run by Bill’s alleged former mistress, Julie Tauber McMahon!
“With just months to go before Election Day, this shady ‘donation’ by the foundation couldn’t have come to light at a worse time for Hillary,” the source says.
The former First Lady’s world-class temper was on full display after the story broke nationally in May, according to shocked campaign insiders.
“Her face went red with rage and she called Bill in full view of several staffers, screaming at him into the phone,” said the source. “She called him a brainless, sex-obsessed idiot and when she was finished, she hurled the phone against the wall!”
Sources say she also demanded Bill provide her with his daily itinerary the night before and agree to having one of her staffers travel with him to monitor his moves.
McMahon, 56, was instrumental in having the former President make the massive commitment to the Energy Pioneer Solutions company, in which she has a 29 percent ownership stake.
“It’s highly doubtful that Bill would have given the company a second look if Julie wasn’t on board.”
Bill first pursued McMahon after Hillary was elected U.S. Senator from New York in 2000 and traveled to Washington, D.C., for weeks at a time.
The buxom blonde was a neighbor who lived near the Clinton family home in Chappaqua, New York, and was nicknamed “The Energizer” by his Secret Service detail after frequent clandestine visits to their estate.
Now insiders reveal that Clinton never intended to tell his wife about the shady contribution.
“He intended to cover it up permanently because of Julie’s involvement and, he thought he’d get away with it,” the source claims.
Clinton staffers even tried to bury the financial commitment and scrub it from the agenda at the Global Initiative’s 2010 financial conference.
It was only restored after multiple media inquiries were made about it.
“The main reason it was buried was to avoid calling attention to Bill’s cozy relationship with Julie,” according to another source.
McMahon, a divorcee with three kids, told reporters that she didn’t know how the financial commitment to her company came about, and that she wasn’t involved, but insiders say Hillary wasn’t buying it.
“Hill’s suspicions of Julie all along have now been confirmed and turned to rage that Bill’s gotten into bed with her on this business venture — and now having it come out as she’s fighting for her political life,” a shocked source alleges.
Now insiders say the contribution may result in a Federal probe by the IRS because tax-exempt foundation money is not allowed to be donated to a for-profit business.
Even worse — the investigation could uncover embarrassing details of Bill’s relationship with Julie.
“This is a monumental mess and the timing is disastrous for Hillary,” says the source.

Let full legislature vote on big Nassau contracts

The Nassau County legislature in session on Sunday,

The Nassau County legislature in session on Sunday, October 30, 2011 in Mineola. Photo Credit: Howard Schnapp

Allowing the entire Nassau County Legislature a say and a vote on multimillion-dollar contracts now vetted only by its Rules Committee would not solve all the problems with how contracts are handled, but in a county beset by contract scandals, any help is welcome.
Of the 19 legislators, only seven, four Republicans and three Democrats, sit on the panel that approves the vast majority of county contracts. The setup is unusual in that it allows even very large deals, — such as a 20-year, $1-billion sewer management contract to privately manage the county sewer system — to pass with just committee approval. Most municipalities require full board approval for big deals.


Democrats are calling for a new rule to force a vote of the full legislature for any contract of more than $3 million, a bar that seems high. But they likely won’t even get to force a vote on whether the process of voting on contracts should change. When Republican Presiding Officer Norma Gonsalves doesn’t support a bill, it doesn’t make it to the floor. And she has made it clear she doesn’t like this bill, just as she has opposed most of the meaningful reforms on contracting and contributions by companies doing business with the countyFrom the $12 million contract that got then-Sen. Dean Skelos and his son convicted on federal corruption charges, to the bevy of no-bid contracts written for just under the $25,000 limit that evaded any need for legislature approval, Nassau’s contracting process has been a disaster. This change would require all 19 legislators to vote on big contracts and allow lawmakers to publicly challenge the contracts on the record, and that couldn’t hur
t

WATCHDOGS: Blacks bear brunt of marijuana enforcement in Chicago

WATCHDOGS: Blacks bear brunt of marijuana enforcement in Chicago

AP photo
Four years after the Chicago City Council decriminalized the possession of small amounts of marijuana, African-American neighborhoods continue to bear the brunt of enforcement, a Chicago Sun-Times investigation has found.

As anticipated, the Chicago Police Department is making a fraction of the arrests for misdemeanor marijuana possession it made in 2011 — the last full year before cops were given the option of ticketing, rather than locking up, people caught with about half an ounce or less.

PROMOTED STORIES FROM PoliticsChatter


But 18 of the city’s 20 community areas with the highest rates of pot possession arrests and 17 of the 20 with the highest rates of ticketing are majority African-American, city records show.
Twelve of the 20 neighborhoods with the lowest rates are mostly white. The others are predominantly Hispanic or don’t have a majority population group.
That’s all despite the fact that academic studies have found marijuana usage is similar across racial and ethnic boundaries.
Among the Sun-Times’ other findings:
• Largely black East Garfield Park on the West Side has the highest rate of arrests and ticketing for misdemeanor possession — 72 times greater than in predominantly white Edison Park, which ranks lowest.
• The 19 blocks with the most arrests for marijuana possession are all on the West Side, and the 20th is on the South Side — all in African-American neighborhoods.
• Among the 20 blocks where the most tickets have been issued for misdemeanor possession, 11 are on the West Side, seven are on the South Side, and two are on the North Side.
• Since August 2012, the 5100 block of West Madison Street in Austin has seen more arrests (362) and tickets (91) for pot possession than any other single block in Chicago. That’s the result of police flooding that block in response to concerns about violence between factions of two street gangs, according to a West Side police supervisor.
• Since 2013, more than 4,600 of those the police chose to arrest, rather than ticket, have been convicted — and 89 percent of them were black, 8 percent Hispanic and 2 percent white, court records show.
• Even with decriminalization, seven of every 10 convicted of having small amounts of marijuana ended up doing jail time.
• Through the first four months of this year alone, 72 misdemeanor possession cases resulted in a jail sentence. During that same period, lawmakers were debating and passing legislation in Springfield to lessen marijuana penalties statewide. The measure was signed into law last month by Gov. Bruce Rauner.
• Among those arrested was a 21-year-old man the police said they caught with only the burnt end of a single joint. Its estimated street value: just $2. The police said they pulled the man over after he rolled through a stop sign in West Garfield Park. They impounded his car, and he spent two days in jail before going in front of a judge and pleading guilty.
The new state law, which took effect at the end of July, is aimed at addressing such disparities, says state Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago, its chief sponsor. Police statewide will no longer have the option of making an arrest for possession of less than 10 grams, which is about a third of an ounce.
State Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago. | AP photo
State Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago. | AP photo
“It really does allow us to focus our attention where problems really are,” says Steans, who says she hopes the change will free police to spend time instead on more serious offenses and on crime prevention.
But some Chicago cops say decriminalization has taken away a tool they’ve used to combat street dealing and press suspected gang members for information.
“It was an easy way to get access to these guys,” says a veteran officer who often works on the West Side. “You have to be able to hold something over somebody’s head. That’s just the way it works. It doesn’t sound right, but it’s a fact of life.”
The officer, who spoke on the condition he not be named, says cops in Chicago have now been told not to make arrests for marijuana possession unless the quantity involved is at least 100 grams — more than 3.5 ounces.
The rate of both arrests and ticketing has plummeted since the court-ordered release last November of police dashcam video showing 17-year-old Laquan McDonald shot to death by a Chicago cop, Officer Jason Van Dyke, who’s now charged with first-degree murder.
In 2015, the department issued about 7,000 tickets for marijuana possession. This year, through April, the number was just over 1,200 — on pace for 3,700 by year’s end.
That reflects a trend across the nation of moving away from the “broken-windows” policing strategy, which called for making street stops and busts for even minor infractions in hopes that would also help prevent more serious crimes.
According to some officers interviewed, that’s one reason crime has risen in Chicago and other cities over the past year. One longtime police supervisor says it’s also confusing. “After 30 years on the job, I don’t understand how to enforce the laws any more,” he says.
In recent years, the police suspected that many of those they busted for possession were dealing but couldn’t prove it, he says: “The officer doesn’t hear the conversation between the person allegedly selling and the buyer. So it’s a possession case. And possession is now not a crime.”
Most of those convicted of low-level marijuana possession in Chicago since 2012 had been arrested before, court and police records show.
For example, that 21-year-old who was arrested on the West Side with just the burnt end of a joint? He’d previously gotten probation for a drug charge and has a case from 2013 pending for possession of an illegal gun.
In another case, a 27-year-old man was pulled over in March 2014 for driving through a stop sign in West Humboldt Park. His driver’s license was suspended, and police searched him and said they found four baggies with marijuana they estimated were worth only $40 total. But all were labeled with blue stars or green dollar signs — apparently denoting sales brands, according to the police.
He spent five days in the Cook County Jail before pleading guilty and being released. A year later, he was arrested and convicted again for marijuana possession. Altogether since 2004, the same man has been charged with marijuana possession or soliciting drug business 27 times, and he’s been convicted five times.
Richard Dickinson, a Chicago defense lawyer, sees the handling of marijuana-possession cases as a sign of how policing went wrong years ago.
“They’re nickel-and-dime cases that police use to conduct what would otherwise be illegal searches and seizures,” Dickinson says. “It’s a law enforcement tool to do investigations they wouldn’t otherwise be able to do.”
He started out as a lawyer four decades ago. Back then, he says, if police caught someone with a joint, “They confiscated it and told the person to go home.”
With the advent of broken-windows policing in the late 1990s and early 2000s, possession arrests soared, police data show.
Ald. Chris Taliaferro (29th). | Sun-Times files
Ald. Chris Taliaferro (29th). | Sun-Times files
Ald. Chris Taliaferro (29th) says police in his West Side ward often make arrests to disrupt open-air drug markets that can be “catalysts” for violence.
“But they have to do so lawfully,” says Taliaferro, a former police officer. “And that means without profiling.”
Taliaferro says he supports the use of tickets whenever possible because they usually don’t take cops off the street as long as arrests.
It’s unclear how effective ticketing statewide will be. So far in Chicago:
• Just 1 percent of the marijuana possession tickets issued have resulted in full payments of fines of $250 or $500. Another 24 percent have yielded partial payments, sometimes as low as a few dollars. About 29 percent of the tickets were dismissed or dropped. And the other tickets — thousands of them — have been blown off or remain in limbo.
• Beside lessening the burden on police and the courts, ticketing people for misdemeanor possession also was touted as a source of revenue. But fines have brought in a total of less than $679,000 in four years.
Marijuana has been legalized for recreational use in four states — Colorado, Washington, Oregon and Alaska — as well as the District of Columbia. In November, voters will be asked to sign off on legalization in five more states — Arizona, California, Maine, Massachusetts and Nevada.

Steinberg: Criticize me and you criticize everyone like me

Sen. Mark Kirk (clockwise, from upper left), Carol Moseley-Braun, Donald Trump and Rep. Tammy Duckworth
Sen. Mark Kirk (clockwise, from upper left), Carol Moseley-Braun, Donald Trump and Rep. Tammy Duckworth | File photos

Being black and being stupid are two entirely separate, independent conditions. Blackness does not make you stupid any more than stupidity makes you black. If it did, a lot of Donald Trump supporters would wake up aghast to find themselves suddenly African-American (though not as horrified as African-Americans would be to suddenly have all these Trump supporters in their midst).

The two conditions can, of course, reside in the same individual, such as former Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun who was both black and dumber than a rock. She manifested this in a variety of alarming ways, including, as I pointed out during her quixotic bid for mayor in 2011, by ballyhooing a deeply flawed poll that suggested she would defeat Rahm Emanuel which, let the record show, she did not.
When I wrote a column elaborating upon that theme, Moseley-Braun howled that I was a racist — you can go on YouTube and see videos of her minions picketing the paper, demanding I be fired — arguing that to criticize her was to criticize all African-Americans.
This came to mind when the senator currently holding her seat, Mark Kirk, said Barack Obama was “acting like a drug dealer in chief” and Kirk’s opponent, Tammy Duckworth, called the remark “unhinged,” which Kirk denounced as an attack on all stroke survivors everywhere.
“For people that have strokes, they can make tremendous comebacks,” Kirk said.
Some can. Others can be gravely impaired. Which group Kirk belongs to is open to debate. He claims he is recovered enough to do his job though, it seems, not so much that he can be criticized without immediately ducking for cover behind his disability.
OPINION
You can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can’t both insist that you are a fully capable, functioning adult ready to perform your governmental duties then collapse weeping and pointing at your boo-boo when someone says something mean about you. Moseley-Braun grabbed her race like a human shield, unaware that she wasn’t deflecting the idea that she’s dumb so much as illustrating it.
As congressman from my 10th District, Kirk was just competent enough to be a senator before his stroke, a sour mediocrity who couldn’t resist the temptation to embellish his mundane naval career.
The question whether his stroke incapacitated him further is one the electorate is allowed to ask. I sat next to him at the Dante Awards a year ago May, and while I didn’t give him a physical, he seemed pushed to the limits of his endurance by the demands of eating lunch. This, I hasten to say, is not an indictment of all people who have had strokes everywhere, but an observation specific to Kirk on a certain day.
Though in Kirk’s defense, his job is not attending luncheons. His difficulties seem to have humanized him; for instance, he has fought the plague of heroin addiction and, in general, behaved very much like a Democrat, as camouflage from the great GOP political die-off expected to accompany the looming Trump fiasco.
And Duckworth’s exact language, saying Kirk “lacks the ability to control what he’s saying” does have a vague medical wink, a whiff of ammonia. Probably not intentional — Duckworth isn’t clever enough to lay out a trap by design. Nonetheless, Kirk grabbed the slur and waved it over his head, in case you missed it the first time.
You could wonder whether Kirk says idiotic things — remember his “bro without a ho”? — because he’s infirm or because he’s fundamentally an idiot. In the end, does it matter? Just as you could wonder whether Duckworth could ever be elected to any political office were it not for her status as a disabled vet — you certainly can’t chalk it up to her boundless charisma or genius as an administrator.
The problem for voters is we have to pick one. I’d lean toward Duckworth, simply because Kirk, once re-elected, will go back to being a Republican, at least until the summer of 2022
.

Clinton accuses Trump of bigotry — Trump dubs it smears and lies


Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Manchester, N.H., Thursday (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert) And Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks at a campaign event in Reno. / AFP PHOTO / JOSH EDELSONJOSH EDELSON/AFP/Getty Images
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Manchester, N.H., Thursday (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert) And Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks at a campaign event in Reno. / AFP PHOTO / JOSH EDELSONJOSH EDELSON/AFP/
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump traded harsh words on bigotry on Thursday with the Democratic nominee charging that Trump has “built his campaign on prejudice and paranoia” and the Republican accusing Clinton of dragging out “a tired, disgusting argument.”

“This is a moment of reckoning for all of us who love our country and believe that America is better than this,” Clinton said in a 45-minute speech in Reno, Nevada. “Donald Trump has built his campaign on prejudice and paranoia. He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party.”

In an effort to short-circuit Clinton, Trump spoke ahead of her in a speech in Manchester, New Hampshire, confronting head-on allegations that he is racist, defending his hard-line approach to immigration while trying to make the case to minority voters that Democrats have abandoned them.
His poll numbers slipping behind Clinton’s with less than three months until Election Day, Trump said Clinton is really attacking his supporters.
“Hillary Clinton is going to try to accuse this campaign, and the millions of decent Americans who support this campaign, of being racists,” Trump predicted at his rally in Manchester. “It’s the oldest play in the Democratic playbook: say ‘You’re racist, you’re racist, you’re racist.’ It’s a tired, disgusting argument. It’s the last refuge of the discredited Democratic politician.”
“To Hillary Clinton, and to her donors and advisers, pushing her to spread her smears and her lies about decent people, I have three words,” he said. “I want you to hear these words, and remember these words: Shame on you.”
Moments later, Clinton warned that voters should not be “fooled” by Trump’s efforts to rebrand his campaign.
She says Trump is the first nominee of a major party to stoke and encourage racial hate. The country, she’s arguing, is at a “moment of reckoning” where voters and public figures must stand up and denounce prejudice and paranoia.
Trump’s real message, she says, is “make America hate again.”
Clinton highlighted Trump’s support within the “alt-right” movement, which is often associated with efforts on the far right to preserve “white identity.”
“No one should have any illusions about what’s really going on here,” she said.
Clinton said Trump is spreading hateful messages online by retweeting white supremacists and anti-Sematic tweets and images to his millions of Twitter followers, arguing “There’s been a steady stream of bigotry from him.”
Clinton also pushed back on unfounded accusations from Trump and others that she suffers from poor health.
She says: “His latest paranoid fever dream is about my health. All I can say is, Donald, dream on.”
The Democratic presidential nominee says Trump’s questions about her health are an outgrowth of treating “the National Enquirer like Gospel.”
Her campaign also released an online video that compiles footage of prominent white supremacist leaders praising Trump, who has been criticized for failing to immediately denounce the support that he’s garnered from white nationalists and supremacist, including former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke.
Trump — whose campaign says has never used the term “alt-right” and disavows “any groups or individuals associated with a message of hate” — tried to turn the tables on Clinton, suggesting that she was lashing out in order to distract from questions swirling around donations to The Clinton Foundation and her use of her private email servers.
“She lies, she smears, she paints decent Americans as racists,” said Trump, who then defended some of the core — and to some people, divisive — ideas of his candidacy.
“People of this country who want their laws enforced and respected by all, and who want their border secured, are not racists,” he said. “People who speak out against radical Islam, and who warn about refugees, are not Islamophobes. People who support the police, and who want crime reduced and stopped, are not prejudiced.”
Trump, who also met Thursday in New York with members of a new Republican Party initiative meant to train young — and largely minority — volunteers, has been working to win over blacks and Latinos in light of his past inflammatory comments and has taken to claiming that the Democrats have taken minority voters’ support for granted. At rallies over the past week, the Republican presidential nominee cast Democratic policies as harmful to communities of color and in Mississippi on Thursday he went so far as to label Clinton “a bigot.”
“They’ve been very disrespectful, as far as I’m concerned, to the African-American population in this country,” Trump said. He was joined in Mississippi by Nigel Farage, one of the architects of Britain’s push to leave the European Union — a movement that succeeded, in part, because voters sought to block the influx of foreigners into the United Kingdom.
Many African-American leaders and voters have dismissed Trump’s message — delivered to predominantly white rally audiences — as condescending and intended more to reassure undecided white voters that he’s not racist, than to actually help minority communities.
In his speeches, Trump has painted a dismal picture of life for black Americans, describing war zones as “safer than living in some of our inner cities” and suggesting that African-Americans and Hispanics can’t walk down streets without getting shot. The latest census data show that 26 percent of blacks live in poverty, versus 15 percent of the country overall.
But Trump insisted Thursday that his message had already “had a tremendous impact” on the polls.
“People are hearing the message,” he said.
Trump also said that he’ll give an immigration speech “over the next week or two” to clarify his wavering stance on the issue. During the Republican primary, Trump had promised to deport the estimated 11 million people living in the United States illegally. In recent days, he’s suggested he might be open to allowing them to stay.
Before the meeting in New York, several protesters unfurled a banner over a railing in the lobby of Trump Tower that read, “Trump = Always Racist.” They were quickly escorted out by security as they railed against Trump for “trying to pander to black and Latino leaders.” ”Nothing will change,” they yelled.