Is Trump shaping a historic political realignment in 2016?


Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump signs a copy

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump signs a copy of one of his books for an audience member at the NBC "Today" television program in Rockefeller Plaza on Thursday, April 21, 2016. Photo Credit: AP

Conventional wisdom says Donald Trump can’t be elected president.
Not only does he score poorly with women and non-white voters, but also more than a third of Republicans say they’ll never support him, according to a recent Rasmussen survey.

That percentage surely would shrink were Trump to become the Republican nominee, but an intraparty gulf anywhere near that magnitude would be electorally prohibitive when added to Trump’s other challenges, or so the thinking goes.
But what if Trump and his team are up to something else? What if they’re planning to write off millions of conservative voters and instead pursue a new, broad and hazily defined populist coalition that includes political independents and disaffected devotees of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, should former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton become the Democratic Party nominee?
This at once sounds farcical and obvious.
First the obvious: Of course, Trump is going to move to the political middle. It’s standard operating procedure in general election campaigns. And then the laugh: The archetypal Sanders voters is a 23-year-old Brown graduate with a degree in environmentally progressive feminism, hardly the Trump type.

In a single week, Trump called for removing the “Human Life Amendment” from the national Republican Party platform, and for liberality in granting transgender Americans access to changing and bathroom facilities of their choice. (He has since taken a half-step back on the latter, but only a half-step.)
But a couple of recent Trump statements suggest this could be his team’s strategy, nonetheless. That, or The Donald’s message indiscipline knows no bounds.
Cartoons: The race to the presidency in 2016
Trump’s statements should rationally disabuse any notion that he’s still seeking to corral holdout conservative voters. The human life plank, which would update 14th Amendment’s protections to apply to unborn children, has been central to keeping social conservatives in the existing Republican coalition since it was added to the party platform in 1984. And Trump’s bath and shower room comments clearly appeal more to young progressives than to traditionalist Americans. The question is whether his remarks were genuine or by design.

If Trump pivots into anti-Wall Street messaging a few weeks hence; if he starts talking about the insane cost of a college education and Clinton’s big corporate contributors, that question will be largely answered. If nominee Trump were to pick a moderate as a running mate, it would be cemented.
It’s a gigantic question.
Such a move could constitute a radical realignment of the country’s existing political dynamic. If the Republican National Committee were to willingly go along, it would mean redefining the Republican Party as a centrist vessel for largely white, middle- and lower-middle class dissatisfaction from both sides of the political aisle. It would mean setting the Ronald Reagan conservative wing of the GOP adrift.
Would such a coalition be feasible?
Your election reflections
It just might be: Trump’s model voter, according to political demographers, is white, working class and male, although far from exclusively male. He or she is the crassly proverbial “Joe and Jane Sixpack,” left behind by today’s economy and political structure. Many of these voters are Democrats — and Bernie Sanders supporters.
When you consider that around 63 percent of Americans are Caucasian, and an almost equal percentage are without a college diploma, you can begin to add up the number of potential voters theoretically in play. What you have, ripe for the picking, is a large, not particularly ideological, cross section of frustrated Americans looking to make a statement. Added to that, or rather subtracted from it, might be that Brown and that socially conservative voter, each with no place to go in November. Both might just stay home.
It takes a lot of assumptions to envision a scenario like this unfolding. But it feels anything but far-fetched. Indeed, it’s the only strategy that makes sense at this point, if there’s any logic to Trump’s madness.

Nothing absolute in ‘bathroom wars’



Protesters head into the Legislative building for a

Protesters head into the Legislative building for a sit-in against House Bill 2 in Raleigh, N.C., Monday, April 25, 2016. While demonstrations circled North Carolina's statehouse on Monday, for and against a Republican-backed law curtailing protections for LGBT people and limiting public bathroom access for transgender people, House Democrats filed a repeal bill that stands little chance of passing. (Chuck Liddy/The News & Observer via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT Photo Credit: AP

Cathy YoungCathy Young, a columnist for Reason and Real
Cathy Young is a regular contributor to Reason magazine and Real Clear Politics.
Just when you thought our political discourse couldn’t get any crazier, bathrooms are suddenly the center of heated debate. Progressives are up in arms about a North Carolina law requiring people to use public bathrooms matching the sex listed on their birth certificates, widely seen as discriminatory and intolerant toward transgender people. At least 15 other state legislatures have considered a similar law this year.
Many liberals argue that transgender people have used bathroom and other gender-specific public facilities for decades (sex reassignment surgery has been around since the 1930s and possibly even longer) and suggest that this is a non-issue ginned up by conservatives looking to sow and exploit a panic about men in women’s bathrooms. Many conservatives respond that the mere fact that it’s controversial to require people to use public facilities matching their biological sex shows the triumph of political correctness over common sense.


Some conservatives’ insistence that biological sex at birth should be treated as immutable — anyone with XY chromosomes is a man or boy, anyone with XX chromosomes is a woman or girl — is much too simplistic, not only culturally but scientifically. Some people’s bodies at birth don’t match their chromosomes (hence genetic testing for female athletes). Intersex conditions are rare but real. While the biology of transgenderism is still poorly understood, it’s likely that many who feel “trapped in the wrong body” have a very real brain-body mismatch due to genetic and hormonal abnormalities.
To insist that a transgender man with a male physical appearance and hormonal makeup is “really” a woman because of DNA is hardly common-sensical. Yet the North Carolina law would technically require him to use the women’s room until he’s had his birth certificate changed to reflect the sex reassignment, which transgender advocates say is a lengthy and cumbersome process. A law passed and vetoed in South Dakota earlier this year went further, restricting bathroom access by sex at birth.
But the bathroom panic isn’t quite as baseless or bigoted as progressives claim. The truth is that transgenderism has changed dramatically in recent years. Today, a person who is anatomically male and has not undergone any surgical or hormonal treatments may “identify as female.” There is also a growing population, particularly in college, of people who consider themselves “non-binary” — neither male nor female — and demand to use whichever restroom they feel like.

Some propose phasing out all “gendered” restrooms for ones with fully enclosed stalls and common areas for hand-washing. However, this would entail huge expense and discomfort for most people used to gender-specific facilities.
Are women bigoted if they don’t want a person with a bushy beard in their public restroom? Are men bigoted if they don’t want a person with breasts sharing theirs? For most, it’s less a question of safety than privacy (an even bigger concern in locker rooms and fitting rooms). But the scenario of a sexual predator putting on lipstick and claiming a female identity to gain access to a women’s facility is not entirely far-fetched.
U.S. cartoon roundup
More gender-neutral single-user bathrooms would benefit many people, not necessarily transgender — for instance, parents accompanying an opposite-sex child. Locker-room issues can also be resolved with private accommodations. But compassionate and common-sense solutions may require compromises. The absolutist demand for a “civil right” to have your preferred gender identity validated regardless of appearance or anatomy can only lead to more culture wars.

Republican presidential candidate Sen.Ted Cruz's dream team

Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz and former(Credit: Getty Images/ Gerardo Mora)
Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz and former candidate Carly Fiorina in a discussion with political commentator Sean Hannity during a campaign rally at Faith Assembly of God Church on March 11, 2016 in Orlando, Florida.

Ted Cruz's dream team

By the time presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz announced he was naming former candidate and businesswoman Carly Fiorina as his vice presidential running mate Wednesday afternoon, the news had been flying around for hours. Many didn’t even bother to tune in for Cruz’s news conference, or only listened for a quick moment, missing the far bigger shocker.

After announcing Fiorina, Cruz went on to name his dream-team cabinet, composed of other former GOP presidential candidates. Here are the highlights of his picks, and a bit of analysis to boot.

Secretary of Defense: Sen. Lindsey Graham

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham would make a
(Credit: Getty Images/ Chip Somodevilla)
South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham would make a great Secretary of Defense for two reasons. Graham, after dropping out of the race, gave Cruz one of the most ringing endorsements the Texas senator has received when he said Cruz is, "not completely crazy." Graham is also one of the few GOP stalwarts who can be counted on to get behind the kind of carpet bombing Cruz prefers.

Secretary of Agriculture: Gov. Chris Christie

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, whose veto of
(Credit: Getty Images/ Jeff Zelevansky)
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, whose veto of a bill that would ban farmers from keeping pregnant pigs in crates showed just the right amount of pander as he tried to build support for the Iowa caucuses. You can't teach that kind of pander.

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development: Sen. Rand Paul

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul should lead the Department
(Credit: Getty Images/ Pete Marovich)
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul should lead the Department of Housing and Urban Development, because nothing is funnier than making a libertarian oversee a government-funded housing program, particularly someone who has disavowed the Civil Rights Act. Plus it's a huge money saver, because the departmental budget under Paul would be, oh, zero.

Secretary of Education: Gov. Jeb! Bush

Who knows more about education than Former Florida
(Credit: Getty Images/ Sean Rayford)
Who knows more about education than Former Florida Gov. Jeb! Bush, who practically invented the beloved Common Core. Oh, Common Core's not beloved? Great. Neither is Jeb! Bush. It's a match made in heaven.

Secretary of the Interior: Gov. George Elmer Pataki

Nobody really knows anything about the Department of
(Credit: Getty Images/ Alex Wong)
Nobody really knows anything about the Department of the Interior. And nobody really knows anything about Former New York Gov. George Elmer Pataki. Plus, he needs the work.

Surgeon General: Ben Carson

Former neurosurgeon Ben Carson, of course. Cruz said
(Credit: Getty Images/ Saul Loeb)
Former neurosurgeon Ben Carson, of course. Cruz said Carson's expertise in separating conjoined twins (which Cruz called "Siamese") could only help us with Middle Eastern relations, and said that as an evangelical he was particularly comfortable with devout Seventh-Day Adventist Carson's "whole God deal."

Secretary of State: Gov. John Kasich

Cruz says he knows of no other legal
(Credit: Getty Images/ Alex Wong)
Cruz says he knows of no other legal way to guarantee that Kasich, who "I am so, so sick of" mostly stays out of the country. "I might not have been able to make him go back to Ohio," Cruz said, "But I can make him go to Lebanon."

Secretary of Commerce: Donald Trump

Because let's see him put his
(Credit: Getty Images/ Spencer Platt)
Because let's see him put his "I can make so much money" where his "I have such a big mouth is."

Attorney General

This was Cruz's biggest surprise of all, as
(Credit: Getty Images/ Jessica Kourkounis)
This was Cruz's biggest surprise of all, as Cruz announced he himself would serve as attorney general in addition to being president. "I know it's unusual," Cruz said, "but I am fairly certain that under my watch this nation is going to need the toughest, orneriest and trickiest lawyer in the world and the truth is ... that's me."